The UFC championship belt once symbolized a direct path to financial success, with fighters earning a share of pay-per-view revenue that could transform careers. However, the elimination of PPV events under the UFC’s shift to a subscription model via Paramount+ has dramatically altered that equation.
With the promotion now generating over $1 billion annually in revenue without sharing a portion of it with champions, the value of holding a title has become a contentious topic. Middleweight champion Sean Strickland’s recent willingness to relinquish his belt—won in a May upset over Khamzat Chimaev—without a fight highlights the growing frustration among fighters over perceived compensation disparities.
Industry insiders, speaking anonymously, confirm that even before the PPV era ended, revenue shares were minimal, and the financial upside of being champion had already diminished. While UFC contracts still include base pay increases and promotional bonuses for titleholders, the shift away from PPV revenue has left many questioning whether the belt still delivers the life-changing financial rewards it once promised.
MLB · 2h ago
MLB · 2h ago
MLB · 2h ago
Serie A · 3h ago
NHL · 4h ago
Serie A · 5h ago
Serie A · 11h ago
NBA · 20h ago
See all videos